Revenue Cycle Management: Ten Tips to Maximize Revenue

Author: Carol Hoppe

Healthcare is one of few industries where services are not paid for when they are received. Typically, one party (such as a doctor or hospital) provides services to a second party (a patient), but a third party (a health insurance carrier) is often involved in facilitating financial reimbursement for the services provided.
Money keeps the practice in business. Each phase of the revenue cycle is important, from payer contracts to charge capture and collections. Knowing how to manage the revenue cycle not only ensures the financial viability of the practice, but also minimizes the time and effort spent collecting payment for services rendered.
The purpose of this article is to gain a better understanding of what you can do to efficiently manage the revenue cycle and how to maximize potential revenue.

1:     Review payer contracts
Payer contracts often contain complex reimbursement language and formulas that can be difficult to monitor and manage. It is important to know what you are agreeing to when you sign any contract, but especially when it comes to payer contracts. Be sure you know and understand the expected reimbursement and contractual allowances before you sign. Contract negotiations can be difficult, especially if you are a solo practitioner. You have limited power to negotiate unless your specialty is in high demand and there are limited providers available in your geographic area. When negotiating, be sure to optimize trade-offs and to understand the total value of the agreement prior to contract execution. It could be beneficial to take less reimbursement on office visits if you can get more money on high dollar surgical procedures, but make sure you evaluate this against your current or expected volumes.

2:     Know the Law
Here in Indiana under the 'Prompt Pay' law, payers must pay or deny a clean claim within 30 days of receipt if filed electronically and within 45 days of receipt if filed on paper. Check the laws in your state to see if there are payer deadlines. While the definition of a clean claim could be disputed, no response from a payer within the 30 to 45 day window should result in immediate follow up. Medicare reimbursements are dispersed within 14 days of electronic claim submission, so inquiry on those unpaid claims should occur within 15 to 20 days.
Most practice management systems will allow batching of unpaid claims by insurance type so that inquiry can be made on multiple claims with one phone call or internet inquiry. Pending claims should be worked on a daily basis, beginning with accounts with the highest balance and oldest age first, such that every unpaid account is reviewed at least once every 30 days.

3:     Clean claims = fewer denials
A serious concern in healthcare reimbursement today is decreased or delayed reimbursement due to claim denials. The challenge is how to quickly identify the source of the denials and fix the problems. Education is the key to clean claims. Providers, front desk, billers and clinical staff all contribute to the information that is submitted on a claim. Each individual needs to understand how their role impacts claim payment. When denials are received, they should be identified with a reason code and posted in the practice management system so a denial report can be generated at month-end. This gives managers a clear picture of where further education is needed.

4:     Respond promptly to claim denials
After receiving a claim denial it is important to correct the claim and rebill it to the insurance carrier promptly.  Claims often go unpaid and bump up against timely filing limits when the biller keeps a 'zero pay folder' to work in the future. Denied claims should be addressed daily as they are received.
Each insurance carrier handles resubmitted claims differently so it is important to know what each carrier expects. With some carriers, if the claim is simply rebilled electronically with no notation, the claim will be denied as a duplicate. Some carriers will allow the provider's office to fax a corrected claim directly to their claims processing department. Others require that the claim be resubmitted either electronically or on paper.

5:     Review payments carefully
Payers will often make mistakes when processing claims that need to be appealed for proper reimbursement.  The person posting payments must pay attention and question anything that does not look right. Some things to watch for include:
  • dropped or missed procedures
  • one procedure bundled into another and paid based on one code instead of two
  • modifiers dropped that justify bundled procedures
  • multiple units ignored
  • payment based on the wrong fee schedule
The best practice management systems have the ability to load payer fee schedules so you know when payments are posted whether they were paid correctly or not.

6:     Appeal claims paid in error
Any services paid incorrectly should be appealed. Sometimes errors can be addressed over the phone, but often they require a formal appeal letter. It is important when appealing claims that a cover letter be submitted explaining why the claim is being appealed. The cover letter also notifies the carrier of any attached documentation accompanying the claim. Further documentation may include progress notes, lab or other test results, operative notes, fee schedules, copies of CPT guidelines or Medicare policies to support the appeal.  Keep copies of all appeals and the results for reference with future appeals.

7:     Don't get frustrated, get help!
Practices should not hesitate to contact their State Insurance Commissioner's office if they feel they are getting the run-around from a particular payer after reasonable attempts to collect.
Find your state insurance commissioner at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners website. Commissioner's offices may be called with general questions, but in order for them to investigate a disputed claim they must have written documentation with as many details as possible. Documentation should include a copy of the insurance card, the claim form, and documentation reflecting all efforts to resolve the claim, as well as responses from the payer.  A separate complaint should be filed for each patient involved.  Most insurance companies respond quickly when the State Insurance Commissioner becomes involved.

8:     Patient balances
Sometimes asking patients for payment puts the office staff in an uncomfortable position, especially when the patient becomes disgruntled. However, most insurance companies require that the patient\'s co-pay be collected at the time service is rendered. Staff members working at check-in and check-out should be comfortable asking for payment.  Often providing a script requesting payment helps staff members to be more comfortable and consistent with requesting payments. Contracted providers are obligated to collect the co-pay at the time of service. Failure to do so could be a breach of contract.
The most important thing an office can do is to develop an office financial policy with regard to patient payments. Developing an office policy is important to ensure that all patients will be treated the same with regards to financial payment. A financial policy makes the patient aware of their responsibilities with regards to payment for services. Outline in your policy the exact process which will be followed should the patient refuse to pay on their account.
Attempts to collect outstanding balances should be made each time the patient is seen. The cost of pursuing payment after the patient leaves only decreases the value of the dollar collected. The more time that passes the less valuable the dollar becomes and the more difficult it is to collect. Patients know whether you are an office that expects payment or one that will extend free credit. The most successful practices use one or more of these techniques:
  • Notify patients when scheduling and confirming appointments that they should 1) bring insurance cards and photo ID to each visit; and 2) come prepared to pay copays and outstanding balances at the time of service. Let them know up front what credit cards you accept.
  • Collect copays and outstanding balances at check-in rather than check-out. Staff should be direct without being rude when asking for money. Confidently stating 'Your copay is $35.  Will you be paying with cash, check or credit card?' is better than asking 'You have a balance of $132. Would you like to make a payment today or should we bill you?' Why pay today if you don\'t have to? Your office is not a bank and should not routinely extend credit.
  • Start payment plans at a maximum of three to six months and a minimum of $25. It costs money to send statements and process multiple payments. Offer discounts if the balance is paid in full to get the account settled quickly.
  • Don\'t spend money on statements to collect $5 and $10 balances. Collect small balances the next time the patient is in the office.
9:     Hire and retain the best employees
Generating revenue is the most important task in the financial success of the medical office. The people hired for these roles should be seen as an investment. Ongoing training is critical to their success as the rules and regulations are constantly changing. The cost of one seminar could easily be recouped in a couple of correctly billed surgeries. Incorrect claims or missed charges could be costing you millions. Invest in your billers and do everything you can to retain the best employees. Workers who feel valued will usually deliver exceptional results.

10:   Monitor benchmarks and key performance indicators
Benchmarks and key performance indicators should be reviewed monthly. Let your billers know what is expected so they can monitor and achieve the goals. Analyze trends on a monthly basis and identify any warning signs before they become serious. The following benchmarks are 'best practice' and may be used as a baseline, but each specialty and/or practice may want to adjust these or reference MGMA benchmarks by specialty:
  • Average number of days revenue in A/R at a maximum of 35 days
  • A/R greater than 90 days less than 20% of total A/R
  • Credit balances less than 4% of total A/R
  • Bad debt write-off less than 2% of total charges
  • Net Collections of 96% or greater
There are many other things you can review monthly that will help you monitor financial performance, including:
  • Procedure analysis compared to CMS Norms
  • Ratio of charges to payments and adjustments
  • Drop in reimbursement by individual payers
We are living in difficult times that require offices to do everything they can to keep the practice in business.  Every employee is valuable and should take responsibility for their role in the practice thus helping the revenue cycle to be clean and efficient. This article has shown not only how to manage the revenue cycle and ensure the financial viability of the practice, but also minimize the time and effort spent collecting payment for services rendered.

About the Author
Carol Hoppe is a Senior Consultant at InHealth, and the Director of Billing, Coding and Credentialing at  Indianapolis Medical Management.  She can be reached at carol.hoppe@inhealthconsulting.com
This article can be reprinted freely online, as long as the entire article and this resource box are included.

Outsourcing Your Billing - Are revenue cycle firms a godsend or added expense?

By Bruce Kleaveland | Physicians Practice

Do you enjoy the daily business of medicine? Not the world of patients and symptoms, but the domain of claims, collections, receipts, and reports, for which there is woefully little training in the medical school curriculum.

If you don’t, you are not alone. Thousands of practices have effectively delegated their entire financial operations to third parties. Should you? Let’s take a look at the pros and cons.

First a quick description. The in-vogue name for these financial third parties is 'revenue cycle outsourcers', also known as billing services. Instead of hiring staff to do your billing, you delegate it to the revenue cycle outsourcing firm who manages the entire operation, including coding and review, electronic claims submissions, collections, and financial reporting. The revenue cycle outsourcer’s fees are based on a percent of collected receipts. The more you make, the more they make.

The pros of outsourcing

What’s the case for revenue cycle outsourcing? Here is what the outsourcers would say:
  • Medical billing is complex and best handled by experts. Most offices have to deal with multiple plans and therefore multiple payment schedules, different benefits, and variable rules. Medical billing is also a moving target - plan rules change frequently and even CPT codes are updated annually. It’s hard to keep up. The implications of doing this job poorly are significant. Over-coding (or coding at a higher level than the documentation supports) is a polite term for fraud. Under-coding (or what some docs will call defensive coding) can cost practices millions of dollars in lost reimbursements that they have legitimately earned. There is also the time consuming rework required for claims that are denied because your billing clerk made a mistake on the original claim. A core benefit to outsourcing is that you are dealing with a bank of professionally managed experts who are focused solely on billing. Because billing services are paid on a percentage of collections, they are strongly incentivized to perform well.
  • In-house billing is time consuming for physicians and clinical staff. Dealing with insurance companies takes both physician and other clinical staff time. According to a study by Lawrence P. Casalino, MD, PhD, of Weill Cornell Medical College, physicians spend three hours a week or nearly three weeks per year on these activities, while nursing staff spend more than 23 weeks per physician per year. There also appears to be a disproportionate burden of these tasks on the smaller practice. The same study noted physicians in solo or two-physician practices (particularly primary care) spent "significantly more hours interacting with health plans than physicians in practices with 10 or more physicians." Moving to a billing service won’t eliminate practice interaction with health plans - but it should significantly reduce physician time spent on haggling over unpaid claims.
  • Managing internal billing operations is a pain in the neck. The care and feeding of an in-house billing staff is not trivial. In addition to salary and benefits, a billing staff requires oversight to insure that they are performing optimally. They will also be prone to any of the normal unspoken overhead of employees - illness, variable job satisfaction, hiring and firing, and ability to mesh with other staff members.
Now for the cons

So what are the downsides of outsourcing your billing?
  • It’s not free. As noted above, revenue cycle outsourcers - quite cleverly - typically bill as a percentage of receipts collected. For high reimbursement specialties such as cardiology, billing services will typically charge in the 4 percent to 5 percent range; for primary care, percentages may bump up to the 8 percent to 10 percent level. The billing service’s fees typically are inclusive and incorporate any claims-clearinghouse fees that you might pay if you were doing it yourself.
  • You don’t have total control. Transferring your billing operation to a third party may be uncomfortable for some physicians who revel in the smell of superbills. Some physicians simply prefer to have tighter control over their finances. And while a large number of billing services are local mom and pop operations that allow you to connect in person, increasingly the service is being offered by large corporations serving a nationwide clientele - which makes face time less likely. Do you feel comfortable with delegating your daily financial operations to someone you are likely never to meet in person? If the answer is no, outsourcing may not be a good fit.
Weigh the options

We’ve established the pros and cons. Now, how do you decide? Here are some guidelines:
  • Compare hard costs. This is a pretty straightforward exercise; calculate the expense of doing it yourself (salary and overhead of your billing staff, amount of time you are spending on billing, third party fees for claims clearinghouses, billing related supplies such as claim forms) versus the revenue cycle fees. According to the recent survey of the American Academy of Professional Coders, the average salary in 2009 for certified coders was $44,750, which varied depending on location and experience level. Add 20 percent for benefits and overhead and you have a cost of $53,700.
  • Compare soft costs and intangibles. This represents elements such as the hassle factor of hiring and managing staff to do your billing versus the loss of daily oversight. You should also assess your overall comfort level and expertise with medical billing. It is hard to be an effective manager of an in-house billing operation if you don’t understand what you are managing. There is also a labor pool issue. Is it difficult to find competent billing staff in your location? You may have a brilliant financial manager now, but if she decided to move on, would you be able to easily replace her?
  • Compare effectiveness. This is a little trickier, because it involves making a judgment call regarding your own operation, as well assessing the potential effectiveness of a third party with whom you have not used. In terms of assessing your own operation, here’s simple question: Are you receiving reports on a regular basis? Along with having reports on gross charges, write-offs, bad debt, and refunds, you should know the relative age of your accounts receivable, the average time it takes from patient visit to filed claim, your denial rate for claims, plus checks and balance reports that reconcile payments received with payment entry and daily receipts.
All of these will give some indication of the effectiveness of your billing staff. Armed with this data, you can benchmark your practice against the revenue cycle firm of your choice. They should be able to provide some their performance data on practices like yours. This will allow to you compare effectiveness - and help you make the final decision.

Bruce Kleaveland is President of Kleaveland Consulting, a management consulting firm focused on healthcare IT. He can be reached via physicianspractice@cmpmedica.com.

This article originally appeared in the February 2010 issue of Physicians Practice.

Medicare fraud investigation yields 73 indictments


In what U.S. government officials are calling the largest Medicare fraud scheme to come to light, 73 people were indicted Wednesday and charged with a variety of healthcare fraud-related crimes that involve more than $163 million in fraudulent billing.

The indictments were unsealed in five judicial districts and include a number of alleged members and associates of an Armenian-American crime syndicate, according to Acting Deputy Attorney General Gary G. Grindler, FBI Assistant Director of the Criminal Investigative Division Kevin Perkins and Health and Human Services Inspector General Daniel R. Levinson.

The indictments allege that the defendants stole the identities of thousands of Medicare beneficiaries and numerous doctors and used the names to establish 118 shadow clinics in 25 states, all created for the sole purpose of submitting phony Medicare claims.

“The emergence of international organized crime in domestic healthcare fraud schemes signals a dangerous expansion that poses a serious threat to consumers as these syndicates are willing to exploit almost any program, business or individual to earn an illegal profit,” said Grinder in announcing the indictments.

At the heart of the indictments, federal officials said, is an organized crime enterprise known as the Mirzoyan-Terdjanian Organization, so named for principal leaders Davit Mirzoyan and Robert Terdjanian.

According to the charges filed in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York, the criminal organization had bases of operations in New York and Los Angeles.

A report by the Associated Press noted that Mirzoyan, of Glendale, Calif., and Terdjanian, of Brooklyn, N.Y., were taken into custody on Wednesday. Terdjanian was jailed without bail by a New York judge Wednesday morning. Charges against the ring leaders include racketeering, money laundering, bank fraud and identity theft.

The nature of the case is different than the typical method used to defraud Medicare – in which clinics recruit beneficiaries and bribe them to allow billing Medicare for treatments that are unneeded. According to investigators, this group created phantom clinics and used the stolen doctor and Medicare member identities to bill the agency.

According to the AP report, investigators were alerted by incongruous claims – eye doctors doing bladder tests, ear, nose and throat specialists performing pregnancy ultrasounds, obstetricians testing for skin allergies and dermatologists billing for heart exams.

“The international organized crime enterprise known as the Mirzoyan-Terdjanian fleeced the healthcare system through a wide range of money-making criminal fraud schemes,” said Perkins. “The members and associates located throughout the United States and in Armenia perpetrated a large-scale, nationwide Medicare scam that fraudulently billed Medicare for more than $100 million of unnecessary medical treatments using a series of phantom clinics. We want to restore the confidence in the nation’s healthcare system and assure practitioners we will not stand by and let their identities be used for criminal gain.”

Insurers Make Progress in Claims Processing; Inefficiencies Remain

May 26, 2010 | iHealthBeat

Last year, most private health insurance companies made strides in using technology to improve their provider medical claims processing rates, resulting in marked improvements in transaction speeds of the reimbursements, according to the fifth annual PayerView rankings report released today, the Boston Globe reports.

The rankings report was compiled by Athenahealth, a vendor of billings and records applications, in collaboration with the Physicians Practice management journal. For the report, researchers drew from a database of 24,000 health care providers in 45 states to assess 137 insurers.

According to the PayerView report, health care providers in 2009 on average received their payments seven days faster than they did in 2008. In addition, insurers denied 12% to 18% fewer claims, the report found.


Inefficiencies Remain

Despite the noted progress, the researchers found that inefficiencies remain in the claims reimbursement system. Furthermore, the report notes that state-administrated Medicaid programs nationwide continue to lag behind in their use of technology to accelerate claims processing.

The majority of secondary operations at hospitals, physicians' offices and insurers still are slow and disorganized because the fragmentation of the health care industry makes it difficult to develop technology and transaction standards, according to the researchers.

Jeremy Delinsky, senior vice president at Athenahealth, said, "It's mind-boggling how much waste there is," adding, "Health care transactions in the United States are not done in real time the way transactions are done in almost every other industry." Delinsky noted, "Even in the fastest cases, it can still take three weeks for doctors to get paid" (Weisman, Boston Globe, 5/26).

Dealing with a Difficult Provider – Part 1

February 16, 2010 — solutionsmedicalbilling

One of the things you don’t realize yet when you first start your medical billing business is how different each provider will be from the next. You will need to learn the differences and how to deal with the difficult ones.

Some providers are very easy to work with and some can be very difficult. When you don’t yet have any experience it can be difficult to decide how to handle the problems that arise.

One of the problems medical billing services run into is the doctor’s office that doesn’t send over enough information. It may be that the initial claims lack info or that they fail to send you all the payments. We have experienced providers who fail to tell us about patient payments that have been made and we send a bill for services that have already been paid.

Each of these individual issues is a problem for both the biller and the provider. When the provider’s office sends over claims to be submitted with dates of birth missing or no insurance information, that claim cannot be submitted. This causes a delay in payment for the provider. For the billing service it causes a bunch of problems. First, the biller must notify the provider that they are lacking critical information. Second, the biller must keep this claim available so when they get the necessary information they can complete the claim and submit it. If this is a common problem for an office, you may find that after a few months you have a fat file folder of claims waiting for information that never came. Neither you or the doctor will be paid for these claims until you get the information.

When providers don’t send you notice of all the payments you will find that when you are working your followup reports and checking claims status many of these claims will have been paid. The problem with this is that a biller can’t be wasting their time calling on claims that have been paid. It’s funny that this is usually the same provider who will be calling you demanding to know where all their payments are. It’s difficult for you to tell because you spent 6 hours making phone calls on a 28 page report that should have been a six page report if you could have entered the payments as they actually came in. Now you’ve spent an extra four hours finding out the provider was paid last month. The other problem is that you don’t have the eobs if any of the claims have a secondary payor, you can’t submit them without a copy of that primary eob. Of course there probably were some legitimate problem claims that required attention but you are so frustrated with finding that all these payments were made but not sent to you that you really don’t care at that point. Yes, there were problem claims, but the provider made you look through a mountain of claims instead of the small pile that really had problems. These providers suck up extra time that you may not have allowed for when you originally quoted them a price.

When providers forget to let you know that patients have made a payment and you send them out a bill for that service they already paid for, the patient tends to get mad. This is not good. Not only do you have an angry patient calling you but you wasted money sending out that statement.

So what’s the answer to these problems? Good question. Usually you need to sit down with the provider and explain why this is not a good situation. I must warn you, many do not want to hear about it. Some providers do not want to know what is going on. We explain to our providers that when they don’t send us the eobs it takes us much more work to call to get the information and we have to charge them more. This usually helps the situation. We also explain that we can’t submit the secondary claims without the primary eobs.

Again, you can talk until you are blue in the face and it won’t change things in some offices. That’s when you have to make the decision if this is an acceptable situation to you or if you feel you must cancel your contract with that provider. Sometimes it is just easier to move on and let that client go.

Dealing With a Difficult Provider Part 2

March 18, 2010 — solutionsmedicalbilling

It may come as a surprise to the beginning medical billing service but many providers do not pay their own bills on time. This can be a huge problem. The new medical billing service generally waits several months before they are even able to find, start working for, and bill a new client. You have invested time and money into getting this account started. You anxiously await the first payment to see your efforts come to fruition. Each day you go to the mailbox watching for that illusive check. What should you do when it doesn’t come?

Some doctors are great about paying. Some send the check as soon as they receive their bill. They appreciate the work you do and show it by paying you on time. You will quickly learn that the ones who are not willing to pay on time do not appreciate your work and will give you all sorts of excuses for not paying on time.

As you grow, the problem can grow too. You need to set up policies early to know what to do or you will spend a lot of time worrying about getting paid and how you are going to collect it. We send our bills to our doctors on the first of the month and payment is due by the tenth. We send friendly reminder notices on the twentieth of the month. If the bill is not paid by the first of the next month, we add a finance charge to the next bill.

If a client goes two months without paying, they definitely need a phone call. You need to try to keep your emotions out of the call even if you can’t pay the rent until you get paid. You need to ask if there is a problem with your bill and when can you expect payment. We ask our clients who are slow payers if they are willing to let us put their payments on a credit card. We have many providers who are thrilled to pay this way. They get points on their credit cards and don’t have to remember to write a check. Although it costs us a little, we can depend on getting paid on time.

We also have a policy that if a client goes three months without paying they get a letter from us stating that we have to cancel our contract if we do not receive payment within ten days. It’s a good idea to not let things go this far, but unfortunately it happens. At any rate make sure you decide how you are going to handle this type of problem and put a system in place.

One-third of physician practices do not accept credit card payments

May 29, 2009 | Richard Pizzi, Editor | Healthcare Finance News

IRVINE, CA –

Thirty-three percent of physician offices do not accept credit cards as a form of payment, according to a new survey. This represents a 5 percent increase since a similar survey was conducted last year.

The Physician Office Credit-Card Acceptance Survey, by SK&A Information Services, an Irvine, Calif.-based provider of healthcare information solutions and research, suggests physician practices are limiting this form of payment because patients are being adversely affected by high interest rates, maxed out credit limits and a more challenging ability to qualify for credit.

“Since the U.S. credit crisis exploded last year, creditors have become synonymous with excessive rate and fee increases, and we’re seeing the effects of that in the latest Physician Office Credit-Card Acceptance Survey,” said Dave Escalante, president and CEO of SK&A. “Fewer patients are able to use their credit cards at doctor offices because of the worsening consumer credit situation.”

Escalante said the survey, when segmented by physician-office specialty, indicates offices that specialize in elective or cosmetic procedures – which typically don’t bill insurance companies – are more likely to accept credit cards.

The offices that accept credit cards most often are those of plastic surgeons, with a 91 percent acceptance rate, while pathology offices accept them the least, with a 21 percent acceptance rate.

Other specialties with high acceptance rates are:
  • Ophthalmology (84 percent)
  • Bariatrics (83 percent)
  • Otolaryngology (83 percent)
  • Dermatology (81 percent)
Specialties with low acceptance rates include:
  • Dialysis (27 percent)
  • Geriatric medicine (32 percent)
  • Nuclear medicine (35 percent)
  • Critical-care medicine (37 percent)
Of those offices who accept credit cards, 66 percent take either MasterCard or Visa. The least accepted credit card is American Express, at 27.7 percent. “The recently passed Credit Cardholders Bill of Rights Act of 2009 will lead consumers from misleading contract language and unfair rate and fee increases, which should invigorate consumer credit spending,” said Escalante. “Our report can be used to compare current and past credit spending and physician credit-card acceptance rates. It will be interesting to see how the new law will affect next year’s physician credit-card acceptance rates.

Results of the Physician Office Credit-Card Acceptance Survey are based on telephone surveys with 202,650 physician offices nationwide completed in April 2009.


Photo by Andreas Rueda obtained under Creative Commons license.